Press "Enter" to skip to content

LA Times is a No on Josh Newman Recall

Senator Newman

The Los Angeles Tomes has weighed in on the issue on whether or not State Senator Josh Newman should be recalled.  The answer is no.

From the Times:

Voters in Southern California’s 29th Senate District will cast ballots in a rare recall election on June 5, and here’s some guidance: Just say no.

That’s right. Say no to recalling state Sen. Josh Newman (D-Fullerton), who was legitimately elected to represent this district less than two years ago and has done nothing to merit being tossed from office in mid-term. Say no to the six people — three Republicans and three Democrats (for shame!) — hoping to profit from this abuse of the ballot box by being selected as Newman’s replacement. And say a big heck no to the Republican architects of the recall election, who are using one controversial vote by Newman as a pretext for trying to terminate the Democrats’ supermajority in the state Legislature before the November elections.


No, like any bully, Republicans are picking on Newman because he is vulnerable. The first-term legislator won a narrow victory in 2016 against former Republican Assemblywoman Ling Ling Chang to replace termed-out Republican Bob Huff in this historically GOP district that encompasses parts of Los Angeles, Orange and San Bernardino counties. He hadn’t been in the job six months when conservative talk radio hosts John Kobylt and Ken Chiampou on KFI-AM and former San Diego City Councilman Carl DeMaio started focusing on Newman as the weak link in the Democrats’ chain of power.


The Republicans want a rematch (as does Chang, who is running again), hoping that another election will return the seat to their control. That’s why both political parties have put in millions of dollars and engaged in some dirty tricks in this race. What might the voters in the district want? The instigators of this recall effort don’t care.

Typically, the Editorial Board weighs in on a race only after examining the fitness of the various candidates. In this case, however, we did none of that. We disagree with the premise of the campaign and don’t think any of Newman’s would-be successors ought to replace him at this point. Newman won this seat fair and square in 2016 and has done nothing that justifies his ignoble removal.