Lenore Albert-Sheridan’s campaign for Orange County District Attorney is incredibly honored to announce that retired prosecutor, Leslie Westmoreland, from the Criminal Division of the Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice has officially endorsed her election campaign.
As Deputy Attorney General in the Financial Fraud and Special Prosecutions Section of the Criminal Division of the California Department of Justice, Leslie Westmoreland spent his career fighting for justice for the people of California. During the great financial crises caused by Wall Street, he was part of the California’s Mortgage Fraud Strike Force team.
Take a look at what he had to say about Lenore’s run for District Attorney:
“I have known Lenore for years. She contacted me with potential cases once the A.G. formed California’s Mortgage Fraud Strike Force, of which I was the team member for the Central Valley.
We have communicated frequently on matters of fraud prevention, upholding Californians’ civil rights, and taking on large interests with vigor for the task.
Lenore is more than committed to truth and justice; she advocates for them.
Lenore Albert-Sheridan will be a strong district attorney, and an excellent leader for the entire office.”
If elected, Albert-Sheridan would be the first woman DA in Orange County history.
For more information go to www.LenoreAlbert.com.
A Lenore voter!
Lenore, is the type of fair and ethical individual that is needed in political positions. She cannot be bought and she can’t be silenced. We need change ,and Lenore can deliver the change we are seeking.
I have known Lenore going on two years. She is fighter for truth and justice. No better candidate has ever run for District Attorney. People for the first time will be able to say, “She serves us.”
I’ve also known Lenore a few years. She’s a complete train wreck.
Kudos to Mr. Westmoreland, for taking time out from his hobby of polishing his collection of rare dildos, to make this important announcement.
I’ve known Lenore for 41 years. She represents truth, justice, and the American way . There isn’t a more well-rounded, qualified person. I’m honored to call her friend
The goddess of justice has many obstacles and tribulations in her path, so it has always been. Heads will roll if need be. Certification by the corrupt State Board is a disqualification, when the Board itself is corrupt, corrupt, corrupt! All hail Lenore! Ja’i guru dharma.
I have known Lenore Albert for over 80 years. Even when she was a small child, older children and sometimes adults would come to her to settle their disputes in a fair way. I will never forget how she revived my dead baby ferret. I would follow Lenore into a burning building, or off a cliff.
I always look for a disbarred attorney when seeking legal advice. Especially when they’re tools of Epting.
Lenore is EXACTLY what Orange County needs. Not because she’s a woman, because she seeks truth and justice in all she does. She has never been disbarred by the way, she has been targeted by jealous people afraid of her desire and determination in bringing corruption to the light!
“Lenore is EXACTLY what Orange County needs.”
A DA who can’t practice law? That concept doesn’t seem awful useful.
The DA seldom tries cases; they act more as a manager of a large staff of prosecutors.
Aw…too bad for Lenore: the DA has to be a lawyer. Threatening to decapitate people isn’t enough.
The Lost Lenore.
The DA does have to have an active law license. It is required to “act more as a manager of a large staff of prosecutors.” Or to try cases.
Did I say the DA didn’t need a license to practice law?
Lenore is an embarassment. Can she currently practice law? No, Despite her numerous explanations to the contrary. Her campaign (and previous campaigns) has been a joke from day one. Her latest tactic of attending city council meetings during public comment to promote herself (and subsequently getting cut off) underscores how truly misguided she is. This is same person who railed against Sanctuary activists coming into cities not their own when discussing SB54 and yet she’s been doing the exact same thing, Fullerton being the most recent example when she tried to promote herself, got cut off for campaigning, and then came back to speak on homelessness/affordable housing, Please do us a favor. Organize actual campaign events don’t waste our time.
A district attorney who has no license and new state bar amended complaint cause of action being Lenore forging a client’s signature on a legal form… No license pending cases yes multiple, at the bar court, 100s of thousands owed to others for losing every single case built around her bogus conspiracy theories, which she still tries to convince others it’s true, a district attorney on probation herself (I guess that’s her knowing the system), and Brooke I didn’t know you could access the internet from Jail. You should read the ruling in your case Lenore lost because she admits she wrote your declaration (against the laws/rules) and sent to sign it but her lack of attempt to find you in the jail system is why you lost. Unless Lenore are you using your clients account to try and boost your name…. That’s a classic
Just in case anyone here is new to this blog or me. Yes, I have my “fans” who for the most part stalk everything on the internet about me and come up with these incredibly untrue stories. For the most part, they have violent backgrounds so I have been advised not to engage with them.
They get someone thrown in jail by selling them their sovereign citizen packages and then they blame me for it. I am to blame for almost any and everything that happens to anyone in their mind. That is why they are radicalized extremists. People have to stop giving them money.
Reasonable readers should give greater weight to the endorsement by a real former prosecutor than to anonymous people commenting who most likely have criminal backgrounds that are saying outlandish things.
I am not afraid to go after corruption or domestic terrorists. That makes some people very nervous. Imagine a world where the D.A.’s office was really run for and at the service of ALL people in the community.
A court already ruled I am qualified to run and my name remains on the ballot for that purpose. My candidate statement can be found at http://www.lenorealbert.com or with the candidate filings online at http://www.ocvote.com
Lenore Albert defends the innocent and attacks corruption. The outrage of the corrupt speaks for itself. On the other hand, the best people support her, despite coming from diverse political backgrounds. Everyone from Republicans to independents to the California Democratic Party supports her. There has been a 12,000% increase in the homeless population of Orange County since Rackaickas became District Attorney. He will do everything he can to take more homes from Orange County residents, and with his buddy Spitzer vetoing the South County Mayors’ donation of land for a homeless shelter, he is poised to make OC a homeless capital on par with LA, San Diego, Chicago and New York. Our only way to stop this from happening to OC is to vote Lenore Albert for District Attorney. Intelligent, resourceful and determined, three things her opponents are not.
The district attorney, whether it is Tony Rauckaukus or someone else, does not “take homes from people.” That isn’t how the system works. People get foreclosed on, and the vast majority of foreclosures are lawful. Those people lose their homes during a foreclosure process which has nothing to do with the DA. They might be locked out if they get foreclosed on, then lose an eviction lawsuit, and still not leave. But the DA has little to do with any of that, unless they commit some kind of property crime to try to save their home.
So, no, fail, totally off-point. It’s childish and ignorant to think the DA is “taking their homes.”
I voted for Lenore, just to protest Diamond and Nelson, for being such pontificating apples.
I think Murdock got a trial date for the lawsuit his neighbors filed over the fence he tore down and then put up on a different property line. You’d like to think a knock on the door and a conversation over coffee might be the way to resolve a conflict with a next door neighbor….
Did you know that Murdock took the land from neighbors of Japanese descent?
Wow – such deee-thpickable candidates! By reading here we can learn that having a property dispute with a neighbor, or having a blog which involves “pontificating” about politics, are way, way worse THAN BEING TOTALLY UNQUALIFIED TO RUN FOR OFFICE BY VIRTUE OF A SUSPENDED LAW LICENSE, AND HAVING PENDING ADDITIONAL CHARGES WITH THE STATE BAR
Japanese descent???? NO!!!!
That does it, I’m voting for the lady who can’t legally take the job. Ha. Kidding.
Vote for whoever you want to
Congrats Lenore, on your NEW charges of MORAL TURPITUDE http://members.calbar.ca.gov/courtDocs/16-O-12958-2.pdf
COUNT FIVE
Case No. 16-0-1295 8
Rules of Professional Conduct, rule 3-700(D)(1)
[Failure to Release File]
6. Respondent wilfully violated Rules of Professional Conduct, rule 3-700(D)(1), by failing to release promptly, upon termination of employment, to the client, at the request of the client, all the client papers and property, as follows: On February 11, 2016, and on July 1, 2017, respondent’s client, Nira Schwartz-Woods, instructed respondent to release her file materials and documentation to her. To date, respondent has not released to Schwartz—Woods her papers and property.
7. By not releasing Schwartz-Woods’s papers and property to her at SchwartzWoods’s request, respondent failed to release promptly, upon termination of employment, to the client, at the request of the client, all the client papers and property.
COUNT SIX
Case No. 16-0-12958
Business and Professions Code, section 6068(d)
[Seeking to Mislead a Judge]
8. Respondent wilfully violated Business and Professions Code, section 6068(d), by seeking to mislead the judge or judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact or law, as follows: on or about November 4, 2016, respondent attached as “Exhibit E” to her “Motion to Quash Subpoena for Non—Trust Fund Banking Records” which she filed with the State Bar Court in State Bar Case No. 16-O-12958, a document which she falsely declared under the penalty of perjury to be a “true and correct copy of my retainer with Nira Woods for $20,000.00” which she knew to be a false document at the time she made the declaration and provided it to the State Bar Court.
9. By filing with the State Bar Court a document which she knew to be false, and by falsely declaring under the penalty of perjury that it was a “true and correct copy of my retainer with Nira Woods for $20,000.00,” respondent sought to mislead the judge or judicial officer by an artifice or false statement of fact or law.
COUNT SEVEN
Case No. 16-0-12958
Business and Professions Code, section 6106
[Moral Turpitude: Misrepresentation to State Bar]
10. Respondent intentionally violated Business and Professions Code, section 6106, by committing an act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption, as follows: on or about November 4, 2016, respondent attached as “Exhibit E” to her “Motion to Quash Subpoena for Non-Trust Fund Banking Records” which she filed with the State Bar Court in State Bar Case No. 16-O-12958, a document which she falsely declared under the penalty of perjury to be a “true and correct copy of my retainer with Nira Woods for $20,000.00” which she knew to be a false document at the time she made the declaration and provided it to the State Bar Court.
11. By providing to the State Bar Court a document falsely purporting to be “true and correct,” which respondent knew to be false at the time she made the declaration and provided it to the State Bar Court, respondent committed an act involving moral turpitude, dishonesty or corruption.
12. A violation of section 6106 may result from intentional conduct or grossly negligent conduct. Respondent is charged with committing intentional misrepresentation. However, should the evidence at trial demonstrate that respondent committed misrepresentation as a result of gross negligence, respondent must still be found culpable of violating section 6106 because misrepresentation through gross negligence is a lesser included offense of intentional misrepresentation.
COUNT EIGHT
Case No. 16-O-10548
Business and Professions Code, section 6103
[Failure to Obey a Court Order]
13. Respondent disobeyed or violated an order of the court requiring respondent to do or forbear an act connected with or in the course of respondent’s profession which respondent ought in good faith to do or forbear by failing to comply with the court’s minute order dated February 10, 2015 , which required that respondent pay a sanction of $875 in the case entitled Bonnie L. Kent and Teri Sue Kent Love in their capacity as Joint Trustees of the James Kyle Kent, Jr. “Spousal Trust” et al. v. Fin City Foods, Inc., et al., Orange County Superior Court case number 30-2014—O0713792—CU-MC—CJ C within 30 days of service of notice of ruling, in willful violation of Business and Professions Code, section 6103.
DATED: May 14, 2018 By:
NOTICE — INACTIVE ENROLLMENT!
YOU ARE HEREBY FURTHER NOTIFIED THAT IF THE STATE BAR COURT FINDS, PURSUANT TO BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 6007(c), THAT YOUR CONDUCT POSES A SUBSTANTIAL THREAT OF HARM TO THE INTERESTS OF YOUR CLIENTS OR TO THE PUBLIC, YOU MAY BE INVOLUNTARILY ENROLLED AS AN INACTIVE MEMBER OF THE STATE BAR. YOUR INACTIVE ENROLLMENT WOULD BE IN ADDITION TO ANY DISCIPLINE RECOMMENDED BY THE COURT.
NOTICE – COST ASSESSMENT!
IN THE EVENT THESE PROCEDURES RESULT IN PUBLIC DISCIPLINE, YOU MAY BE SUBJECT TO THE PAYMENT OF COSTS INCURRED BY THE STATE BAR IN THE INVESTIGATION, HEARING AND REVIEW OF THIS MATTER PURSUANT TO BUSINESS AND PROFESSIONS CODE SECTION 6086.10.
*****************
You smell DA material? Me either.
But this IS the choice of Dan Chmielewski, the Liberal OC, and “OC DEM” … only because the Orange Juice opposes her. Thanks for helping re-elect Rackauckas, jerkoffs.
I think someone’s mommy didn’t hug them enough as a child. Lighten up. And I run everyone’s press release and just about everyone’s comments — even yours
since you published the same comment twice, I deleted one; hope you’re OK with that
Just did an IP address search and I know who you are. Have the cojones to post under your own name dirtbag
Oh YEAH? Well come n get me liver lips…I’ll be wating ya great big computer-hugging fairy
Ah, a new IP address. Try to remember when you post under fake names after you’ve posted under your real one
My State Bar status was updated to active as of March 16, 2018 on the State Bar website:
http://members.calbar.ca.gov/fal/Member/Detail/210876
Good for you