

The City of Irvine recently passed a resolution condemning anti-Asian hate. And that’s good because there is a significant amount of anti-Asian hate in the wake of COVID-19 and references to “the China Virus” and “Kung Flu” from Republicans who support Donald Trump. And there’s seems to be an incident of Asian Hate in OC regularly since the shooting deaths of Asian women in Atlanta-area Massage Parlors.
The resolution was introduced by Vice Mayor Tammy Kim in collaboration with the Black Indigenous People of Color (BIPOC) community and it passed the Irvine City Council 4-1 with Councilmember Larry Agran voting no because, – frankly – the resolution isn’t inclusive enough. And he’s right. It’s not.
Kim’s resolution reads: “WHEREAS, addressing anti-Asian sentiment requires collaboration with Black, Indigenous, LatinX, Muslim, Arab and Pacific Islander communities to find long term solutions to stop systemic racism, xenophobia and violence in all our communities and any act of hate against one person is an act against the community as a whole.” Nice. And I agree with all of it but its not nearly inclusive enough.
Council member Larry Agran offered the following change to the 9th clause:
“WHEREAS, addressing anti-Asian sentiment requires collaboration between and among all communities of goodwill to find long-term solutions to stop systemic racism, xenophobia, and violence in all our communities.”
And proving a broken clock is right twice a day, we actually endorse this comment from Council member Anthony Kuo who is Asian:
Stopping Asian hate : “Requires collaboration with all communities.” Short. Sweet. To the point. Inclusive. Effective.
The full resolution is available here: https://irvine.granicus.com/MetaViewer.php?event_id=1779…. The section he refers to reads:
But Kim rejected both suggested edits saying she’d need approval from outside groups that helped craft the first resolution even though resolutions can be routinely edited and passed by council members. Agran stayed true to his principles to vote no because the resolution wasn’t inclusion enough.
Here’s Agran’s statement:
At the City Council Meeting, Councilmember Kim presented a resolution to reaffirm Irvine’s opposition to anti-Asian hate, and to bring residents together to support the establishment of a “radically inclusive and tolerant environment.”
Councilmember Agran shares this aspiration and the underlying concerns. As he said last night: “We have experienced in this country at the highest levels of government, among the highest of elected officials, the kind of anti-Asian hate speech that has led to, in many cases, hate crimes.”
Though the Councilmember deeply supports the spirit of the resolution and had every intention of supporting it, after discussion, he was not able to vote in favor.
“I fully expected to be voting for this resolution, however, I believe a key section put undue onus on a select group of persecuted people without also calling on the broader community — persecuted and otherwise — to take up the important work of addressing hate crimes against Asian Americans and, more broadly, recognizing and dismantling white supremacy in and beyond our City.”
I’m a white male. I’m against racism. But under Kim’s resolution,“addressing anti-Asian sentiment requires collaboration with” only the ones referenced in the clause, leaving out our Hindu, LGBTQ, Jewish, Christian, Senior (yes, ageism is a thing here) Caucasian citizens, and so many others out. She removed a bunch of us who’d support her effort without question, and now her resolution is actually dividing the community instead of bringing it together.
OCYD and College Democrats at UCI on Friday issued a joint press release calling on Agran to be censured and for Democrats of Greater Irvine President Kev Abazajian to be removed as club chair. That’s the news and the release is filled with lots of claims and few actual examples of young Democrats attacked or ignored (call me…I can help your press releases; they need serious work).
The best thing about Irvine’s anti-Asian hate resolution is that it empowers local police to aggressively enforce hate crimes against Asians, making this resolution one with actual teeth behind it. Other OC cities should follow Irvine’s lead. So should the County.
But any resolution to stop Asian hate is empty without provisions to halt human trafficking of Asians in massage parlors, nail salons, nursing homes or as private nannies where they are basically prisoners. But per Vice Mayor Kim, this is sexualizing, fetishizing, or stereotyping Asian women. Just go to Google and type in “Irvine CA+Asian massage+happy endings” and see what pops up. Or, enter your city’s name and use the same search terms (don’t click the links, these sites are loaded with malware and viruses). I’d like to hear her actual plan to combat this type of Asian hate but there is none offered by Kim.
Former Irvine Mayor Beth Krom weighed in on this resolution and Agran’s vote on Facebook. Here’s what she posted:
There are people questioning whether Councilmember Larry Agran is racist or anti-Asian and suggesting his perspective should be seen as #whitesplaining. Perhaps I will be accused of the same for offering this perspective. That would be unfortunate, but apparently our city, which is unique among ALL American cities for being both extraordinarily diverse and thoroughly integrated is now being divided and distracted by discord and disrespect among our three elected democrats and that will do nothing to help advance our interests as a community.
What makes me sad is that I endorsed, supported and actively worked to get all three democrats elected and I respect all three.
We are living in challenging times, and sadly we are seeing incidents of hate and racism around the country that are horrifying. No city is immune, and I am glad we have a City Council and a Mayor that have made it clear that hate and disrespect will not be tolerated here.
Larry Agran does not need my defense, but having watched Larry fight developers and stand with the public from the time we moved here in 1985, successfully secure the protection of 16,000 acres of Open Space in perpetuity, get chlorofluorocarbons banned in Irvine before the world followed suit, be recognized by Women For: Orange County for his advocacy for equality, inclusion and education (the only man to my knowledge to receive their Suffrage Day award), fight to pass the Human Rights Ordinance in Irvine to ensure NO group was discriminated against, initiate the Global Village Festival and expand civic participation across all cultural communities, the notion that Larry does not respect or seek the protection of any group is absurd.
I was mentored by Larry when I ran in 2000, and when I flipped the City Council we worked side by side to stop the El Toro airport and advance the Great Park. The Republicans and the developers smeared him, but he never stopped fighting for the Veterans Cemetery — even after he lost his seat.
Larry and I served together for fourteen years. We encouraged and supported Sukhee Kang when he expressed interest in running and we were proud to see Sukhee serve as the first Korean American Mayor of a Major American City.
I have always said that nobody gets through this life alone. Had there been no Larry Agran there would’ve been no Beth Krom. Had I not served on the City Council and as Mayor, I would not have had the opportunity to appoint Farrah Khan as my Community Services Commissioner. I supported Farah in every race that she has run and in turn, Farrah was instrumental in supporting Tammy Kim. For those of us who have seen what is possible when you have three visionary members of the City Council, the outcome of the election was a hopeful sign.
Everyone should be looking for ways to leverage what they uniquely bring to the table — not attempting to undermine or marginalize one another. As the city prepares to celebrate our 50th anniversary, there is much value in having somebody on the City Council with a hands-on perspective about how we have evolved as a city. Farrah and Tammy may represent the future, but we should never forget those who helped make Irvine a city we can all be proud of — and feel safe in.
I do not regret endorsing or supporting Farrah Khan, Tammy Kim or Larry Agran. We needed a change on the City Council. Each one of these leaders earned their seats. Their issues should not be with each other, and none of them should be squandering one ounce of energy challenging each other’s credibility.
Beth’s right. We are better than this. Time for our three council members to start acting as a team.
Systemic racism is a problem for everyone. And anyone can be racist towards any racial group. It’s wrong period. If you want to solve this problem, it needs everyone in the village – not a select group of people. Kim’s resolution is actually creating division where it should be creating unity.
*****
Mayor Farrah Khan issued a statement on the verdict in the George Floyd murder case on April 20. She writes:
The absurdity of the Whereas clause in Councilmember Tammy Kim’s Resolution is that it renders the intended activism useless. That clause says that collaboration should only be amongst the few oppressed groups she listed, and that does not even include Asians. That Resolution will certainly accomplish nothing without collaboration with the group that probably includes most of the oppressors, like the Whites!
And why not include the experiences of other oppressed groups, like Jews and the aged, as Councilmember Agran mentioned. And by extension, why not include everyone (Councilmember Kuo’s fix) who wants to solve the problem of hatred against minorities, especially those who have either experienced hate against themselves or have recognized their own hate against others?
Somehow, Agran’s attempt to correct Kim’s Resolution in order for it to be useful is being taken by some as the “White Lives Matter” meaning. There is no absurdly implied claim in Agran’s (and Kuo’s) correction that whites are being discriminated against. It’s just that as the main oppressors, Whites and Christians (as well as everyone else) must be included in any meaningful and effective discussion of how to eliminate discrimination and hatred.
[Open Letter] Respectfully, I Strongly Disagree With Your No Vote on 4.2 CONSIDERATION OF A REQUEST BY MAYOR KHAN, VICE MAYOR KIM, AND COUNCILMEMBERS CARROLL AND KUO TO ADOPT A RESOLUTION AGAINST ANTI-ASIAN HATE
Councilmember Larry Agran,
Thank you for allowing me the opportunity to communicate my personal thoughts with you.
I wish to preface first before making my overall comment, I appreciate and I wish to personally thank you for your decades of public service, specifically to the City of Irvine. And I really appreciate you taking into strong consideration Tuesday evening’s City Council Agenda Item 4.2, and your thoughtful and thorough approach at taking the resolution very seriously and for your overall support of “the spirit of the resolution.”
However, with respect, I have to strongly state for public record, I am deeply disappointed in your lone No vote on April 14th. Furthermore, I am personally offended; as a unanimous vote shall state for public record; for the world to see, that the elected leaders of City of Irvine; the 72nd most populous city in the United States; and a city which cherishes, honors, and respects its rich AAPI community; and celebrating the diversity of its many residents’ of Asian descent.
Based on your public comments made Thursday evening, and your publicly released written statements made from your official social media and from your City Council office, is the overall symbolism that the 4.2 Resolution ultimately aims to address. For so many in our communities here in Irvine, AAPI community is SCARED. AAPI seniors are FEARFUL TO GO OUTDOORS. AAPI women are PERPETUALLY LOOKING OVER THEIR SHOULDERS. AAPI and Asians are being harassed, beaten, sexually attacked, hurt and yes unfortunately some are murdered. Literally on our streets. You are entirely missing the overall point indicative of your No votes. You have failed in the overall goal of protecting your constituents. You have failed to protect the most vulnerable, e.g. seniors and many who are smaller in stature, and overall you have failed to be a leader on this very important issue.
I am available to speak on this topic, I welcome any and all opportunities to discuss with you and with your City Council office, regarding the many shared experiences that I personally have lived while being Yellow in United States of America.
Respectfully,
Luis Manuel Huang
Northwood 92620
949-591-9089
luismhuang@gmail.com
We had a murder on our streets? Details please
Google Vicha
Google Vicha
That’s SF, not Irvine. Your comment suggested it was Irvine
Though I don’t always agree with Councilmember Agran, he is correct to oppose this resolution for the reasons he raised.
We have a peaceful and diverse community.
We have crime yes, but our City exceeds most in safety and security.
Why Tammy Kim continually engages in topics that create anxiety and unrest in our lovely City is a concern.
The Vice Mayor of a major City requires thoughtful decisions and maturity
This inexperience is not reflecting well, in my opinion
Question for Mayor Shea:
With regards to alarming rise in Anti-Asian Hate Crimes and Violence, what specific proposals would you recommend to protect our most vulnerable in Irvine (e.g. elderly, and women without black belts in Karate).
Thankfully you have no elected office and are reduced to screaming into here, the void.
Just wrapped up a 4 year term on the DPOC Central Committee and was an ADEM before that. The traffic for this post is anything but the void.
It’s a cold day in Hell when I give praise to Anthony Kuo for a policy suggestion or when Christina Shea leaves on comment on this blog that compliments Larry Agran. Time to buy some lottery tickets
I dont have any objections to the proposed changes from Kuo and Agran. However, it was not the right time and specific resolution. BIPOC wrote the resolution and it should be respected with a Up or Down vote, as it turned out 4-1 in favor of 4.2.
Here is where I have keeping score:
April 13th
4-1 (Larry Agran lone NO vote)
April 14th
Joshua Block, DGI Communications co-Chair (and removed from DGI Board executively removed by Dr Kev over suggesting removing Larry Agran from DGI Meeting schedule for April 18th)
April 15th / April16th
Luis Huang, I issued my Open Letter
LiberalOC article publication
OCYD and UCI Democratic Club issues joint press release demanding the resignation of Dr. Kev and re-installment of Mr. Block
DGI Board, issues apology to Mr. Block, per majority vote (unanimous)
Dr. Kev issues public apology to Mr. Block
Dr. Kev issues public statement against Larry Agran’s vote…
Christina Shea backs Larry Agran (see above)
SO HERE ARE THE GRAND TOTALITY OF THOSE IN IRVINE WHO SUPPORT LARRY AGRAN’S VOTE “ON 4.2 RESOLUTION ‘DIVIDING’ IRVINE…”
Dan Chmielewski
Larry Agran
Christina Shea
[Lonely company there Mr. LiberalOC…]