Press "Enter" to skip to content

McCarthyism? Censorship? None of That Holds Up in LeTourneau Case

It’s been a week since Jeff LeTourneau resigned from his leadership positions in the Democratic Party of Orange County.  He remains a member of two committees he once led and is still a voting member of the body which many still find unsavory and Republicans are using as a weapon to strike our candidates in key races.

LeTourneau’s supporters haven’t been quiet on social media about his removal and there’s been a misapplication of the term “McCarthyism” applied to those who sought his removal.  This simply isn’t the case.  There are also suggestions the demands for LeTourneau’s removal was a muzzling of a progressive voice that amounted to censorship of his free speech.  That’s not true either.  But let’s take each argument down a logical path.

McCarthyism described the practice of publicly accusing government employees of disloyalty, specifically McCarthyism soon evolved to include false charges – often without evidence — accusing government employees of political disloyalty or subversive activities and using unsavory investigatory methods to prosecute them.  This then extended to other segments of the public, notably Hollywood.

None of this applies to LeTourneau’s situation. He did praise a communist despot and offended the county’s Vietnamese community on both sides of the political spectrum. And even when he was contacted by a number of people about the post, LeTourneau didn’t seem to grasp the weight of his words and didn’t seem to understand why he should resign or face removal.

Silencing a progressive voice or censorship isn’t in play here either.  No one made LeTourneau write a post praising Ho Chi Minh.  He has expressed support for Antifa and Marxist rhetoric on social media.  He resisted the tug and resigned from leadership positions in the Party but remains a member of the Central Committee and a member of those committees he once led.  There are plenty of people who think even this is too generous treatment for his lack of responsible free speech by someone who held no cards to play.

During the meeting to remove Victor Valladares, an alternate member voting to remove Victor used a Spanish gay slur in the chat function directed at Victor.  I didn’t see it, and I wouldn’t know the term, but LGBTQ members quickly reported the infraction to his elected member and that person was removed as a alternate.  And that was the right thing to do.  Imagine if a similar comment on Ho Chi Minh was uttered about the LGBTQ community? Or Latinos? Or Women?  Or Muslims?  Or Jews?  How fast would LeTourneau light the torches to punish the offender?

Jeff LeTourneau addresses the DPOC Central Committee during officer elections January 14, 2013. (Photo: Lou Delgado)

In regards to silencing LeTourneau’s voice, it’s not.  He has a 40-year career as a activist that still provides him a platform.  He has his social media feeds to say whatever he wants. It’s up to the recipient of his message to give him any weight to his speech from here on out.

And LeTourneau shouldn’t be judged in the context of this singular issue.  There have been several other infractions from verbally assaulting signature gatherers seeking to recall Josh Newman (watch the tape and see how people couldn’t wait to sign because of LeTourneau’s behavior).  There’s confrontations in Anaheim and Irvine City Halls that were heated (in Irvine, police had to escort Council member Farrah Khan to her car after being threatened by LeTourneau. I will always remember how he made IUSD trustee Sharon Wallin cry if she didn’t endorse a candidate LeTourneau wanted her to even though Wallin didn’t know the candidate.  There’s never been an apology for that.

There is a difference between free speech and responsible speech.  If you are a party leader, your words need to be carefully chosen.  A lesson that Valladares still hasn’t learned.

There was no witch hunt for LeTourneau’s removal. But he gave the party no choice.  His apology came off as insincere, and knowing how much he resisted calls for his resignation even after four congressional representatives asked for it taints the apology he did issue through the party.  His words and actions have erased years of positive work for the party in Little Saigon that the DPOC will now have to invest more resources, times and effort to get back to where we were – and the full extent of the damage will be more apparent on election day when we examine elections for Board of Supervisors First District, AD72 and CA-48.

As LeTourneau lost an outright election for AD55 for the 2021 edition of the Central Committee, he needs a voting member to name him an alternate.  Otherwise, he can attend meetings (once COVID19 is over) as a guest and make announcements during public comments.  But elected members ought to think twice about appointing him as an alternate; it will make other members question your judgment. Frankly doing so would be seen as a sign of disrespect to our current Party chair.

So there’s no McCarthyism (watch the movie “Good Night and Good Luck” for a primer) and there’s no censorship.  Just bad judgement and a lack of awareness of what those words praising a despot meant to those residents of Little Saigon.

I taught a class at Chapman University in 2013 on Reputation Management.  How you can spend a lifetime building your reputation only to shatter it in a moment.  We used Anthony Weiner as an example; how he misbehaved, apologized, was forgiven by his wife and friends and colleagues and was on the verge of a political comeback only to do the same damn destructive behavior.  It cost him his career, his marriage and many friendships.  The person responsible for LeTourneau’s reputation is him.

On a more tangible note, LeTourneau ought to send his Vice Chair badge back to the Party’s HQ in Orange.  Pretty sure he knows the address.

 

3 Comments

  1. OC Observer OC Observer September 9, 2020

    I get it. This blog has completely devolved from “Challenging Orange County’s Right-Wing Noise Machine” to a place for Dan to air his personal vendettas. How’s readership these days? Nobody cares about your insider Irvine gossip. Every member of the team who co-wrote with you (not FOR you) has jumped ship. You are the common factor with all these individuals. You are known countywide as a toxic individual to avoid at all costs. Your petty wars with Greg and Vern show the kind of person you are. All this does nothing to advance Democratic candidates or liberal causes at any level.
    Keep gloating about this short term battle, Dan. You’re losing the war.

    • Dan Chmielewski Dan Chmielewski Post author | September 10, 2020

      Hey sorry for not approving this or getting back to you last night; we had to put our 17-1/2 year old puppy down and it wasn’t a good day. But let’s review — there’s considerable discussion of insider Irvine gossip generated from these blog posts on multiple social media feeds. I’ve written about Tustin, Anaheim, Santa Ana and South County issues the best I can while running a business. Readership here is just fine especially when you factor analytics from SoMe — certainly enough to earn me press credentials for certain trade shows. Every member of the team who co-wrote with me has other factors that prevent them from blogging — all related to current employment or conflicts of interest with related work (Chris has a position on a Union’s retirement board, for example, and cannot write for us any longer. To make it sound like these people have left because of me isn’t accurate. We did cut Sean Mill for an ethical issue, but he’s since moved to Riverside and become a Republican. Greg and Vern? Last wrote about Greg last Fall. Last wrote about Vern in 2018. And as far as being toxic and cause for avoidance, just where exactly do you think this piece came from? Days of discussions with more than a dozen central committee members and political candidates and consultants who think Jeff is a welcome in the party as a bastard to a family reunion. But by all means, keep lobbing bombs over your VPN wall under a pseudonym without being privy to a number of moving pieces. I’m losing the war? You aren’t even in the fight Major Bonespurs…..

    • Dan Chmielewski Dan Chmielewski Post author | September 10, 2020

      Dude. I get it You’re sharing false info hoping someone believes you but you won’t put your name to it because, at the heart, you are a coward.

Comments are closed.